Jonathan Charteris-Black sets out to raise critical awareness of the language used by political leaders to convince others. Such rhetoric. Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor (second edition) Jonathan Charteris-Black Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, , pp. Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor JONATHAN CHARTERIS-BLACK is Senior Lecturer in Applied Linguistics at the.

Author: Shajora Mikashakar
Country: Honduras
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Finance
Published (Last): 12 May 2016
Pages: 204
PDF File Size: 4.40 Mb
ePub File Size: 7.52 Mb
ISBN: 230-6-31951-643-8
Downloads: 21207
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Kazilkree

Professor Jonathan Charteris-Black – UWE Bristol

Appendix 11 Clinton Corpus. In Party Conference or Party Convention speeches, one preaches to the converted as it were and the rhetoric will politlcians that fact of that rhetorical situation.

Appendix 15 Bush Corpus. A corpus study of the British press. Don’t already have an Oxford Academic account? The analysis is corpus-based. He has published extensively in the areas of figurative language, corpus linguistics, cognitive semantics and English for specific purposes. Therefore, the same number of similar types of speeches delivered before similar types of audiences should be analyzed in order to get a more balanced yet comprehensive picture of the rhetoric of US Presidents and UK Prime Ministers.

Click here to sign up.

For instance, on 15 Februaryhe stated: Charteris-Black,albeit not in conjunction with a computer program which can detect metaphors see e. For example, he often personified Britain positively and Nazi Germany negatively, imagining Britain as a hero and Nazi Germany as a monster p.

  CRA T2151 PDF

Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor – J. Charteris-Black – Google Books

Lexis Journal in English Lexicology Briefly: Charteris-Black Limited preview – In Search of New Benchmarks: Appendix 1 Churchill Corpus. University of Chicago Press.

His analyses of the rhetoric of US politicians, however, could have gone further in identifying allusions that many Americans would recognise. It would have been nice, however, to see Fauconnier and Turner credited when conceptual blending theory is introduced, and some mention of the edited collection by Carver and Pikalo on political language and metaphor.

On 10 Augustfor instance, he stated: However, one would have to wait until Obama leaves office to write such a chapter. You could not be signed in.

Bedrettin Yazan and Nathanael Rudolph eds: A vital cause and effect relation, in other words, is simply presupposed. Third, the speeches discussed throughout the book are assumed to be persuasive, but they are never empirically proven to be so. Appendix 17 Obama Corpus. The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. For example, he did so to positively associate good government with creation and to negatively associate terrorism with destruction.

Receive exclusive offers and updates from Oxford Andd. Metaphor and Heroic Myth.


The Persuasive Power of Metaphor 2nd edn – review pre-press version. Despite periodic laments about the decline of parliamentary oratory, language — and thus rhetoric as the art of verbal persuasion — is clearly as politicias as ever to the business of politics, especially where relations with the media and through them the public are concerned.

It explores their use of metaphors, their myths and how language analysis helps us to understand how politicians are able to persuade. For Churchill and his listeners, in politciians words, winning the war was construed as successfully completing a journey whose destination was victory.

Sign in via your Institution Sign in.

Professor Jonathan Charteris-Black

The Persuasive Power of Metaphor J. According to Charteris-Black, critical metaphor analysis is not restricted to metaphors, but also takes in metonyms March Invited Speaker, University of Manchester.

To purchase short term access, please sign in to your Oxford Academic account above. It should be clear that both terms have negative connotations.